**Human consciousness, as analyzed in “Being and Nothingness” (1943), encounters an explicit control mechanism in the form of self-imposed bad faith, whereby individuals actively manipulate their own perception to deny freedom and evade authentic responsibility for their choices.**
Within “Being and Nothingness” (1943), the operation of self-imposed bad faith functions as a psychological tool through which individuals create a divide between the “for-itself” (conscious being) and the “in-itself” (thing-like existence). Bad faith is presented as a concrete and recurring process wherein a person intentionally deceives themselves about the nature of their own freedom, often by adopting externally defined roles or preconstructed social identities. Through this act of self-misrepresentation, consciousness exerts internal control over itself, preventing genuine acknowledgment of one’s own capacity for choice and the anxiety it produces. This dynamic is sustained by a deliberate refusal to confront the reality of personal responsibility, thereby enabling the individual to defer or negate the anguish associated with radical freedom. “Being and Nothingness” details how this manipulation of self-understanding is not imposed externally, but originates within the subject’s own consciousness as an ongoing, self-regulating mechanism for controlling discomfort and authentic self-realization. The analysis precisely dissects the logic, process, and consequences of this form of internal control, grounding it in existentialist ontology rather than any external system of governance.
—
Philosophy
Psychology
Literature
—
### Related Sections
This book is also covered in other reference sections of the archive.
Book overview and background
Writing style and structure
Quick reference summary
Additional historical and reader-oriented information for this book is discussed on related reference sites.
📚 Discover Today's Best-Selling Books on Amazon!
Check out the latest top-rated reads and find your next favorite book.
Shop Books on Amazon